ATHEISM BIHCHIANNA
Pathian hriatna hi mihring
nihphunga bei ve ang hiala ngaih theih a nih laiin tunlai khawvelah Pathian
hnawlna leh a awm tak tak pawh rin lohna a lian sawt hle. Pathian awm hnawlna
(Atheism) hi mihring chanchinah thil thar tak a nih rualin scientific worldview-in
a chîm sân telh telh ang zelin Pathian awm rinna (theism) a tlahniam telh telh
thung a. Tun hma deuh chuan Atheist Scientist leh Philosopher te chuan an
thurin an ngawihpui deuh mai mai laiin, tunlaia mite erawh chuan Pathian an
‘ning’ tawh a, Pathian awm lohzia ‘Chanchin \ha’ chu \hahnemngai takin an hril
tawh a ni.[1]
Tichuan, khawvel inher dan chu: ‘Pathian a awm’→ ‘Pathian awm dawn em ni?’
→ ‘Pathian a awm lo a niang,’ → ‘Pathian
awm rin hi buaina thlentu a ni’→
‘Pathian awm rin tlat chu a mawl thlak’ → ‘Pathian a ninawm’– tih a ni
ta hial a ni.
Kan
hriat angin ‘New Atheists’ an tih mai Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Christopher
Hitschen, leh Daniel C. Dennett te hian thawm an nei ring angreng hle a.[2]
Amaherawhchu, an thil sawi lam uar thiam viau mah se thinker leh philosopher
puitling taka ngaih an ni hauh lo. An beih ber Theology an hriat chian lohna
avanga nuih an hlawh deuhthaw fo mai.[3]
Daniel Dennett tih loh hi ‘seasoned thinker’ han tih tur an awm lo a ni awm e.
Atheist Philosopher Michael Ruse phei chuan, “Heng mite hian Atheist nih min
tizak,” a ti hial a ni.
Pathian Nihna (Attributes) Chungchânga Harsatna
(The Problem of God-Concept):
Fiamthua
kan lo inzawh \hin pawh ni se, “Pathianin a chawi zawh loh lung a siam thei ang
em?” tih hian Pathian nihna sawifiah a harsatzia a tilang a. Pathian nihna kan pawm
pangngai ‘famkim(perfect)’, ‘engkimtithei(omnipotent),’ ‘engkimhria(omniscient),’
tih angte hi mi pakhata hmehbel vek dawn chuan sawi fiah harsa tak a ni a. A
nihna pakhat chu a nihna dang kalhin a lang zel. Pathian nihna hrang hrang
(attributes) avang hian \henkhat chuan Pathian chungchâng chu thil inkawlkalhin
a bawm (self-contradictory) a ni a, thil awm thei lo (divine impossibility) a
ni, an lo ti ta \hin a ni. Heti teh nuaih a nih avang hian Philosopher James
Thrower chuan Pathian chungchâng hi sawi loh law law fihlim thlak zawkah a ngai
a hial a ni.[4]
A harsat dân chu hetiang hi a ni:
(i)
Pathian
hi engkimhria a nih chuan hmalam hun zawng zawng pawh a hria tihna a ni ang a, mahse
engkim tithei a nih leh si chuan hmalam hun zawng zawng pawh a tidanglam leh
vek thei tihna a ni dawn a. He nihna pahnih hi inkalh tlat, hmer kawp theih lohah
an ngai.
(ii)
Pathian
hi thlarau (taksa nei lo) a nih chuan minung (person) anga sawi hleihtheih loh
a ni mai dawn a ni, tiin Philosopher Antony Flew a \ang tawh \hin a.[5] Minung
(person) nihnain ruangâm (body) neih a keng telah a ngai.
(iii)
Pathian
‘tawp chin nei lo’ (infinite) hian thil dang zawng zawng laka hrang a nihna nen
hmer kawp a harzia sawiin, “Mihrang nihna chuan tawp chin neih (finite) a keng
tel a. Tawp chin nei lo na na na chu thil dang nena a hranna pawh kan sawi thei
chuang lovang. Heng thil pahnihte hi inkawlkalh an ni,”[6]
tiin Atheist Philosopher lâr Kai Nielsen a \awng chhuak a ni.
Nitin nuna
kan ngaihtuahna pangngai a\ang chuan heng thute hi holam angreng tak angin lang
thei mah se, ngaihtuahna fîm a\ang chuan hnawl theih an ni mang lo a. Mizo
Kristiante Pathian rin dan pangngai Theism a\angin a harsa zual a. Theologian ten
nasa taka sawifiah an tumna, Analogical approach (Thomas Aquinas),
Panentheistic (Paul Tillich) leh Process theology (Charles Hartshone) tih te hi
an \an lak dân langsar zual a ni a.[7] Hêng
theological explanations te hian pawm tiawlsam deuhvin lang mah se, theistic
God, kan buaipui tak hi an hnawl emaw, an sawi nêp deuh emaw a ni deuh mai si
a, keini ho chuan pawm harsa kan tih ka ring.
Heng
hnawlna zawng zawngte hian an tum ram tak an thleng bik lo vek a. A hmasa berah
chuan, Pathian nihna hmerkawp chungchangah hriatfiah har deuh awm mah se,
Pathian a awm loh chhan \ha anga ngaih ngawtin awmzia a nei vak chuang lo va; a
nihna te sawifiah a ngaihna a tilang mai zawk a ni. Person nihna hi taksa
neihah a innghat ber lo tih hi Philosopher tam tak pawm dan a ni ve tho bawk a.
Dualist philosopher te chuan rilru leh taksa hi inzawm thukin inluhthelh zeng
zung mah se thil hrang an nihzia an sawi \hin.[8]
Tin,
Pathian engkimtithei (omnipotent) a nihna kan sawi hi fimkhur a \ha. Rilru a lo
lang zawng zawng ti vek thei leh ti duh
mai tura ngaih chi a ni lo vang. Engkimtithei a nihna chu a nihphung (nature)a
innghat a ni tho a, a nihphung kalhin engmah a ti dawn lo va, a ti thei lo a
ni. Engkim tihtheihna chuan thilsiam zawng zawng chunga thu a neihna a lantir
a, a thu thuin an awm a ni, tih hi a ni zawk. Pathianin square hi a tibial thei
lovang, a nihphung nen a inmil lo; a chawi zawh loh lung a siam thei lovang, a
nihna a kalh a ni mai dawn si. Pathian chu a sual thei lo a, a thi thei lo a,
chatuan mi nihna leh thilsiam nih a kawp thei lo a, a nihna kalhin engmah a ti
thei lo a ni.
Pathian
chungchânga harsatna langsar tak dang chu Pathian a inthup tlat (hiddenness) hi
a ni. Kum zabi 20-na chawhma lama Atheist lar ber pawl Bertrand Russell khan,
“I thih hunah Pathian han hmu ta la eng nge i sawi ang?” tih zawhna chu, “Pathian
hnenah chuan ‘Evidence min pe \ha tawk lo’ ka ti ang,” tiin a chhang. Eng
vangin nge Pathian a awm leh awm loh inhnial a ngaih fo? Mi zawng zawng hriatin
inlantir mai se. Eng vangin nge kan mamawh lai ber hian a ngawih vung vung \hin
le? Mi zawng zawng hmuh theihin chiang bangin inlantir se ni mai tur. Heti a
nih avang hian Atheist ho chuan inlantir tur Pathian a awm lo emaw, Pathian
sual tak kan mamawh lai taka inthup bo tlat emaw a ni e, an ti.
Kristian
Theologian leh Philosopher ho tan chhanna awlsam tak a vâng khawp mai. Oxford
Philosopher Richard Swinburne-an Pathian inthup tlat nachhan chu a fin leh \hat
vang zawka ngaiin, hnial rual lohva chianga a inlantir mai chuan mihring tan
duhthlanna hman theih a ni tawh lo vanga, Pathian nena kan inkar chu tihluihna
thil a ni mai dawn niin a sawi a.[9] Hemi
zûl tho hian 1957 daih tawh khan Alisdair MacIntyre chuan, “Pathian awmzia hi
logic leh ngaihtuahna fîm hmanga pho chhuah theih ni se chuan keimahni
duhthlanna thiang ngeia Pathian hmangaih a theih dawn lo a ni,” a lo ti daih
tawh bawk.[10]
Tin, Pathian hi a nih ang angin kan hmaah inlan sela chuan mihring rilru, taksa
leh thlarau chakna hian a dawngsawng zo dawn lovang a, mihring tihboralna a ni
zawk hlauh lovang maw? A inthup hi min hum a tumna zawk a ni lovang maw? Thilsiam
leh mi rilru leh thinlunga a inpuanna hi mihring tlin tawk leh hmu duh leh pawm
duh tâna chiang tawk a ni lawm ni?
2.
Comments
Post a Comment